3 ms·

So I looked for all instances of 'network server'. Nowhere else in the license text is there any requirement that the source be made available on a network serv

So I looked for all instances of 'network server'. Nowhere else in the license text is there any requirement that the source be made available on a network server, other than in that disjunctive clause I posted. Thus, I stand by my original belief that the source code has to be made available to users, and that snail mail / individual requests of the source code are a viable means to comply with the license. And I stand by my original belief that this copyleft group is politically motivated, as it publicized the claim that truth social is not complying before it gave it any time to comply.

woodruffw 5y ago
If you had searched for "computer network" you would have found it. It's in section 13, "13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.": > Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software. You're welcome to believe whatever you want about the SFC's motivations. But the language of the AGPL is clear.