4 ms·
This site is likely to leak user data just like many before it. If the Republicans are for free anonymous speech, why don't they host Tor servers, write a simp
by trakq 5y ago
This site is likely to leak user data just like many before it.
If the Republicans are for free anonymous speech, why don't they host Tor servers, write a simple web site instead of a hack and tell all users to use Tor?
- bink 5y agoImagine teaching your grandpa how to use Tor.
- 5560675260 5y agoDo you really have to? It could be as simple as using a different browser (and waiting for a minute or two after startup).
- iammisc 5y ago[flagged]
- KittenInABox 5y agoDo churches not have zoom meetings and email lists? Genuinely asking, as I'm not religious but my understanding is that remote worship is a pretty well-solved problem in abrahamic religion- radio, tv, mailing lists, zoom, etc.
- iammisc 5y agoWell as a Catholic, no. Mass is not valid via virtual 'remote' anything. Mailing lists? Sure. But mailing lists are run by google or other companies. Most people just text or call or tell people stuff using their mouths and ears
- KittenInABox 5y agoI mean given the poster I was responding to was talking about facebook groups I figure that "this is run by a company" is already done with. > Well as a Catholic, no. Mass is not valid via virtual 'remote' anything. I'm not Catholic, but when I google "Catholic mass zoom" I see a ton of stuff. Is there like a religious leadership/doctrine these are against or something?
- iammisc 5y agoCatholic mass is about receiving the eucharist. You can broadcast the mass but it's watching a TV show not getting a sacrament.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- inawarminister 5y agoYou're talking about Abrahamic so I'll chime in. For Muslims, remote worship is still not broadly accepted. Its better to do the prayers with your family or people you live with rather than doing it with a screen. However, remote discussions and teaching is okay. Not prayers or worship of God though.
- iammisc 5y agoI'm talking catholic which explicitly and unequivocally differentiates between remote and in person. Remote mass and communion is not possible period
- Steltek 5y agoTrump's and the Right's temper tantrum against social media platforms long predate Covid lockdowns. It started when conservative users went so far over the edge that no one could deny they were violating a site's TOS anymore and a handful of long overdue bans started coming out. Of course, those actions were all carefully crafted to placate the outcry without jeopardizing too much revenue.
- iammisc 5y agoYawn. Good thing real person to person speech has no TOS. I'll make sure to bring up your comment at my next far right friends gathering.
- etchalon 5y ago… are you under the impression liberals DON'T have that too?
- d35007 5y ago> Because republicans don't need or care for free anonymous speech, or social networks, since we typically have large networks of real-in-life friends. I would be interested in seeing data to back up these assertions. Given how frequently some conservative news sources complain about things like cancel culture and how many conservative social networks have sprung up in the past few years, I'd guess that you're wrong. It seems like some conservatives really do care about social networks, whether those networks are anonymous or not.
- antifa 5y agoMaybe if you live in California, but I grew up in "the southern states" where "cancel culture" and censorship have been the norm for decades, for people who aren't conservatives. Conservatives living in million dollar+ mansions crying about being critiqued on Twitter don't know real cancel culture.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]