3 ms·
The thing I think Doctorow is missing is the motivation at the engineering level to get a patent. There is very minimal strategizing between corporate attorney'
by mips_avatar 5y ago
The thing I think Doctorow is missing is the motivation at the engineering level to get a patent. There is very minimal strategizing between corporate attorney's about how the patent might be strategic. If something is patentable, the engineering teams will often pursue a patent mostly motivated from a bragging rights perspective. It's a great way to give recognition to engineers. Most of Google's/Microsoft's portfolio are collections of patents like that. Maybe at a portfolio level there is some strategizing, but not at the level of the engineers actually inventing things.
- mogopugh 5y agoThe patents are usually at least nominally related to a product, and the allocation of engineering to product is very intentional. You're correct that there's some loss in that process, and lots of funny business/perverse incentives besides, but engineers aren't generally patenting totally random things.