4 ms·
>""Intel 4"" is inferior to Samsung's and TSMC's 5nm processes on paper {...} According to transistor density information this is false (https://en.wikipedia.o
by eulers_secret 5y ago
>""Intel 4"" is inferior to Samsung's and TSMC's 5nm processes on paper {...}
According to transistor density information this is false (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nm_process https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nm_process)
TSMC 5nm density: 173 MTr/mm^2
Samsung 5nm density: 127 MTr/mm^2
Intel 4 (estimated): ~200 MTr/mm^2
Got a source? I'm willing to change my mind, but the data doesn't agree with your assertion from my point of view.
Samsung's process has always lagged TSMC and INTC. It's part of why the 3080 is so hot/power hungry.
- DCKing 5y agoThink I may be mistaken here. Would be good if ""Intel 4"" can compete!
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- chelical 5y agoIntel's numbers are theoretical. They're still relying heavily on multi patterning for their current chips. They have yet to demonstrate competency with EUV. Intel 4 is also projected for 2023. Tsmc are producing 5nm chips right now.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]