Bogus how? Sources? > Nowhere in this article can you conclude that APPLE specifically opposes this bill BECAUSE of the climate change clauses in it. That is

Bogus how? Sources? > Nowhere in this article can you conclude that APPLE specifically opposes this bill BECAUSE of the climate change clauses in it. That is a lot of caps. Apple gives money to group A. Group A opposes a bill that contains environmental provisions. Apple will not refute the actions of group A. Who cares if group A says their objection is for other reasons. They are still trying to sink a bill with environmental provisions while saying they are in favour of said bills. Apple can't have it both ways.