3 ms·

Because I read it and it was a slog. There are large portions of the book that are unrelated to the story and are painful to get through. But saying that makes

by yuuu 5y ago

Because I read it and it was a slog. There are large portions of the book that are unrelated to the story and are painful to get through. But saying that makes you look dumb, whereas asserting how much you love it makes you look like a fabulously cultured and intelligent connoisseur of high literature. Whatever, though.

allturtles 5y ago
I think you should consider the possibility that other people sincerely like this book, even the portions you found tedious, and aren't just pretending in order to show off their culture and intelligence. What does 'zabzonk' have to gain from proving his culture and intelligence to 'yuuu' and 'allturtles'?
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
lbebber 5y ago
I didn't really care for the story itself that much, I was more fascinated by the whaling culture and the glimpse it provided of the views of that time and place, along with its fantastic writing. Which is why for me it wasn't a slog at all.
- yuuu 5y ago
  If you're looking for something shorter and more readable about whaling, I'd recommend In the Heart of the Sea. The (nonfiction) story told there was used by Melville as inspiration for Moby Dick. Unlike Moby Dick, that was a book I could not put down, but my brain is also the size of a peanut.
  - lbebber 5y ago
    Awesome, thanks for the recommendation
mlyle 5y ago
I think a lot of it comes down to how you read it. I usually read a book in a couple of sittings. This favors lighter fare, with copious excitement to keep one engaged. I could never do this with Moby Dick. But with a 10-30 page reading per day, you hear about some interesting thing: perhaps mostly whaling and sailing, perhaps advancing the plot and characters. It's not enough to sustain an excited big read, but it's certainly enough to make you wonder about what you'll read next. The chapters average 3-4 pages long. I think this is a hint that it's intended to be consumed in morsels.

by yuuu 5y ago

allturtles 5y ago

I think you should consider the possibility that other people sincerely like this book, even the portions you found tedious, and aren't just pretending in order to show off their culture and intelligence. What does 'zabzonk' have to gain from proving his culture and intelligence to 'yuuu' and 'allturtles'?

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

lbebber 5y ago

I didn't really care for the story itself that much, I was more fascinated by the whaling culture and the glimpse it provided of the views of that time and place, along with its fantastic writing. Which is why for me it wasn't a slog at all.

yuuu 5y ago
If you're looking for something shorter and more readable about whaling, I'd recommend In the Heart of the Sea. The (nonfiction) story told there was used by Melville as inspiration for Moby Dick. Unlike Moby Dick, that was a book I could not put down, but my brain is also the size of a peanut.
- lbebber 5y ago
  Awesome, thanks for the recommendation

mlyle 5y ago

I think a lot of it comes down to how you read it. I usually read a book in a couple of sittings. This favors lighter fare, with copious excitement to keep one engaged. I could never do this with Moby Dick. But with a 10-30 page reading per day, you hear about some interesting thing: perhaps mostly whaling and sailing, perhaps advancing the plot and characters. It's not enough to sustain an excited big read, but it's certainly enough to make you wonder about what you'll read next. The chapters average 3-4 pages long. I think this is a hint that it's intended to be consumed in morsels.