4 ms·
v2 are deprecated of safety. The "rewrite in some corporate meme language" would address this issue.
by Zababa 5y ago
v2 are deprecated of safety. The "rewrite in some corporate meme language" would address this issue.
- hyproxia 5y ago>The "rewrite in some corporate meme language" would address this issue. No it won't, the issues with v2 are with its design, not its implementation.
- hyproxia 5y agoOff-topic, but can someone tell me if this comment is phrased properly? I suspect that using "with" twice in the sentence is a little bit wrong, but I don't know how to correct it.
- Zababa 5y agoI think it's fine but the repetition sounds wrong, if that makes sense.
- jrh206 5y agoPersonally I would say: “the issue with v2 is its design, not its implementation” or “one of the issues with v2 is its design, not its implementation”. However your initial phrasing is perfectly intelligible, and probably grammatical (not that that’s so important, if it’s intelligible).
- superkuh 5y agoThe way users of v2 effect the safety of v3 and the tor project is in terms of directory and resources, etc, and potential exhaustion attacks native to v2. But with porting and some work most of this could be mitigated. The safety of the hash and the length used couldn't but there still isn't a real world example of a collision in use. It's pretty drastic to entirely throw away 15 years of inter-linking, indices, etc when <5% of users (probably less) of onion services have switched to v3.