2 ms·
That had nothing to do with wokeness, it's an obvious bias in the observation. Outside of careerists circles, which is a tiny group, things are quite different.
by brnt 5y ago
That had nothing to do with wokeness, it's an obvious bias in the observation. Outside of careerists circles, which is a tiny group, things are quite different. The idea that life is plannable is again an indicator of a particular background and culture, that is representative of only a fraction of humans.
- rowanG077 5y agoGetting children is 100% plannable. Even if you have no access to birth control you can still choose to not have sex. That has nothing do to with background.
- nsonha 5y ago> you can still choose to not have sex this I cannot agree with since it doesn't align with reality
- rowanG077 5y agoCan you explain how it doesn't align with reality? It's not uncommon anymore that people who are 30 years old still never had sex. For whatever reason they were capable of not having sex for ~15 years. That quite clearly says to me it is possible, some people just are willing to take the risk of having a child.
- nsonha 5y ago> For whatever reason they were capable of not having sex for ~15 years "whatever" being not in a cohabitate relationship
- nsonha 5y ago> The idea that life is plannable is again an indicator of a particular background and culture, that is representative of only a fraction of humans Again you bring up inequality while the discussion is around how to increase birth rate. You didn't even try to link inequality with birth rate. I guess it's cool to raise awareness by hijacking discussion of other issues?