> This is one of the dumbest things I've read today. Your take would mean literally nothing could be discovered. Guess what was one of the dumbest things I've

> This is one of the dumbest things I've read today. Your take would mean literally nothing could be discovered. Guess what was one of the dumbest things I've read today. Their take would mean nothing could be "discovered" again, after it already was discovered by someone else. Can't really see any big problem with that... Except for bullying Johnnie-come-latelies who've been used to thinking of nothing as discovered until it's been "discovered" by them. Big boo-fucking-hoo.