4 ms·
You response is appropriate for a certain kind of definition of "superorganism". To me ants define what a superogranism mean. > Look at the Earth and what Huma
by kushan2020 5y ago
You response is appropriate for a certain kind of definition of "superorganism". To me ants define what a superogranism mean.
> Look at the Earth and what Humans are doing to it. No moral judgements, just the provable
I am not a 100% sure but it seems you are implying about the destructive nature of humankind on the planet earth. That characteristic is not what defines a group of organisms from a superorganism.
- ksaj 5y ago> I am not a 100% sure but it seems you are implying about the destructive nature of humankind on the planet earth. I wasn't, unless it's how all of life is meant to be described. Take any definition of life (which is basically synonymous with an organism when you seek a representative individual) and then consider any list of the requirements of life, and you can't miss that the whole human population and individuals are barely distinguishable when it comes to those definitions of life. We don't just walk (motility). As a species, we also build things and fly as a species to space. That's an example of where humans as a population meet one of the criteria of being a superorganism. Ants satisfy the various requirements in pretty much exactly the same way. Ever seen them make an ant raft and float out the flood. Some of them die, but the ones that don't keep going. Our space travels will be a lot like that. We just made robots to do most of the dying part first.