3 ms·
From the status post, they use the term "primary" which implies they might have more than one network provider. Unclear whether Fastmail is the target, or if th
by nixgeek 5y ago
From the status post, they use the term "primary" which implies they might have more than one network provider. Unclear whether Fastmail is the target, or if the attack is against someone else network-adjacent to them and is just large enough to congest the provider. If the latter, wonder what prevents just withdrawing the announcement and resuming service using the secondary or tertiary provider?
- fsckboy 5y agoseems to me MUCH more likely they know it's the former, and their primary implies higher capacity. your speculation rests on the idea that they are incredibly stupid not to think of using the redundancy they built in.