> responding to your question of why we should be in the business of judging the relative merits of different claims, That’s not a question I asked. > and I e

> responding to your question of why we should be in the business of judging the relative merits of different claims, That’s not a question I asked. > and I elaborated by explaining problems with false balance. Which is why this elaboration isn’t relevant. >> Consider the belief that there is no such thing as biological sex, for example. > I'm pretty comfortable dismissing this out of hand. You seem to be missing the point that it is a common anti-science belief promoted by democrats. As far as I can see you are just advocating for partisanship. That’s a common position to take, and you are welcome to it.