3 ms·
I love GitLab, and am now a shareholder, but advertising it as "drop in replacement" is setting up an evaluator for disappointment At the very least, they use
by mdaniel 5y ago
I love GitLab, and am now a shareholder, but advertising it as "drop in replacement" is setting up an evaluator for disappointment
At the very least, they use just absolutely incompatible yaml files for their CI pipelines (in, of course, an incompatible location in the repo)
But probably the bigger obstacle would be their incompatible API (and incompatible auth to it); that means one cannot grab a cool "github bot/tool for doing $X" and expect it to do anything reasonable in GitLab
- wdb 5y agoI wish Gitlab had a form of the Checkruns API and allow you to annotate lines in source files, e.g. your linting errors or that vulnerability integration wasn't only available in Ultimate
- mdaniel 5y agoI used ReviewDog to wire in Qodana results, so I hear you about wishing it was built in, but it is achievable: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporter-gitlab-mergerequest-discussions--reportergitlab-mr-discussion https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporter-gitlab-merge... Based on my contact with GitLab's built-in other scanning tools, I wouldn't trust their vuln management further than I could throw it, so you're likely not missing much on that front