36 ms·
One more point: your argument has very strong resemblance to that of a racialist trying to justify a belief system that is fundamentally rooted in stereotypes
by the_optimist 5y ago
One more point: your argument has very strong resemblance to that of a racialist trying to justify a belief system that is fundamentally rooted in stereotypes and hatred. Contrast that to the person who supports everyone irrespective of their visuals and self-identity.
- JasonCannon 5y agoHow? You are literally just making things up now.
- the_optimist 5y agoSimply change the labels in your statement and you have textbook discrimination in every country and historical context. “Not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” You saying this now and in the US doesn’t make it less hatred-based or fundamentally unacceptable than it should be. > How about instead, you stand for women and people of color because it's the right thing to do? Regardless of how little they trust white men. Maybe, just maybe, try and understand why they wouldn't trust white men?
- JasonCannon 5y agoOk but tell me when in America have women and people of color ever oppressed white men? That's why "just change the label and it's totally racist bro" doesn't make any sense at all. Because it's been white men who have oppressed women and people of color. Not the other way around. It has never been the other way around. Ever.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoIt makes sense, because judging people by their skin color is wrong, no matter who does it or who they do it to.