Follow the broken logic. 1. "Banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer to online abuse." 2. Primary section in support of #1 makes the far wea

Follow the broken logic. 1. "Banning anonymous social media accounts is not the answer to online abuse." 2. Primary section in support of #1 makes the far weaker claim: "Many abusers are not anonymous" 3. Primary support for #2 is the sentence: "However, research [link] shows that people using their real names perpetrate abuse and bullying too." 4. Linked article actually contains no scientific research, or even data gathering, on the topic at all. This was just a festival of bad argument.