4 ms·
First, you edited your comment. Second, you conveniently omit the part where he says he does support disenfranchised people. Third and most importantly, you biz
by the_optimist 5y ago
First, you edited your comment. Second, you conveniently omit the part where he says he does support disenfranchised people. Third and most importantly, you bizarrely substitute leftist contempt for actual trust. Personally I think this is a pretty selfish statement that involves casting your state of mind and perspective onto someone else with a very negative sentiment.
- JasonCannon 5y agoI edited my comment to add: How about instead, you stand for women and people of color because it's the right thing to do? Regardless of how little they trust white men. Maybe, just maybe, try and understand why they wouldn't trust white men? The horror!
- dang 5y agoPlease don't use HN for ideological flamewar, regardless of how wrong someone is or you feel they are. Even in this pretty hellish thread, your posts are standing out as aggressive. That's not cool. If you're in favor of good causes, or you have better arguments, it's enough to represent those with good information. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- JasonCannon 5y ago>Second, you conveniently omit the part where he says he does support disenfranchised people. I just double checked, he definitely did NOT say that. At all.