5 ms·
Lisp macros can get super obtuse, no matter what people tell me. When I have used Common Lisp, I try to avoid them most of the time.
by germandiago 5y ago
Lisp macros can get super obtuse, no matter what people tell me. When I have used Common Lisp, I try to avoid them most of the time.
- fouric 5y agoI addressed this in my comment: > Regardless, I haven't noticed macros being a footgun in CL. Sure, there are doubtless people out there who have abused it (and will continue to do so) - but that's true for every language feature; meanwhile, it doesn't seem like macros themselves are actually a problem, in the sense that they're particularly easy to abuse compared to the rest of the language (a distinction that I might give to C raw pointers, for instance). Nobody contests that CL macros can get obtuse - but that's not special. You can write obtuse code in any Turing-complete language. Does that mean that we should abolish Turing-completeness? Of course not. How much Common Lisp have you read and written?