4 ms·
Actually, I prefer to write a twitter thread first and then blog it. My 2c on this, - Yes the ux sucks but people are used to reading threads. - There are too
by viksit 5y ago
Actually, I prefer to write a twitter thread first and then blog it. My 2c on this,
- Yes the ux sucks but people are used to reading threads.
- There are tools like thread reader app that unroll threads and store for future reference.
- tools like Dewey help manage threads.
- tools like chirr.app and typefully help create threads with nice heuristics that split your post into threads.
- You get distribution and get to grow an audience.
- specific tweets can be thought of as “highlights” that are retweeted vs liked
- it’s easier to
link other peoples tweets and threads, as well as your own to build a knowledge graph of sorts
- it forces you to think in small increments and build up your arguments in sequence. I’ve found it quite helpful in articulating thoughts.
- lastly, by publishing it on twitter and inviting debate, your audience could get you to rethink povs and also add more of them to your thinking. when you finally write a post, not only are they more likely to retweet and get you seen wider — they’ll feel an aspect of contribution to it which helps cement your relationship with them.
- mrweasel 5y agoMany of these “fixes” suggests that your reader have a Twitter account. People who use Twitter frequently assumes that most people use the platform, which isn’t really true. Still, I can’t fault people for posting longer Twitter threads. Even if setting up a blog is pretty easy, they already have a platform, however flawed it might be. Also few people want to set up a blog for a single story, especially when the target audience was originally other Twitter user.
- viksit 5y agoYeah i think in the spirit of “write every day” and “ship often”, twitter allows you to go from single tweets to threads in an instant, vs a blog where you might agonize over whether it’s ready to publish or not.