> improve quality by making the code better structured and easier to follow "clearer" and "structured" doesn't matter from a compiler point of view. Hence the

> improve quality by making the code better structured and easier to follow "clearer" and "structured" doesn't matter from a compiler point of view. Hence the only ones that can judge "clearer" or "structured" is us, human beings, and that's why I think it's subjective. "goto" is seen as "incorrect" only because of mere subjective reasons: "it's not clear", "it's not structured", "I read in a forum that it's bad", etc. The keyword exists, it works as intended, and it's safe to use when used correctly, as all the things around programming languages. To me, Rust code is a mess and I cannot get used to it. It's not "clearer" even if it's proven to be bug free and all that.