Most of the points seem to be "Google doesn't know hardware". This is a valid point, but the article mostly reads like this one point repeated over and over. F

Most of the points seem to be "Google doesn't know hardware". This is a valid point, but the article mostly reads like this one point repeated over and over. First, it discounts the fact that Google isn't inheriting a shell company; those former Motorola employees? They're still there. Second, so what if they don't already have a dedicated hardware factory already? They've got a dedicated team, one that's proven. Danger, Inc. http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/05/11/andy-rubin-gets-danger-back-together-at-google-to-work-on-android-hardware/ http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/05/11/andy-rubin-gets-dange...