2 ms·
You could've said "no such thing as a force" instead. I believe the person meant "electromagnetic force" instead of "charge". Question remains.
by nsonha 5y ago
You could've said "no such thing as a force" instead. I believe the person meant "electromagnetic force" instead of "charge". Question remains.
- rdtsc 5y ago> I believe the person meant "electromagnetic force" instead of "charge". Question remains. But those are different things... The question is answered by stating that all the other forces are explained by the standard model, with gauge bosons mediating their interactions, while gravity is currently best explained using general relativity. The funny part is, of course, that we were ready to let go, without a severance package even I presume :-) those academics who did not believe that gravity is a force. Given that the leading theory states that gravity is indeed not a force.