4 ms·
The asymmetrical warfare of bullshit "science" is demoralizing. It seems to take so much effort to get the bad stuff taken down, compared with the apparent ease
by ridaj 5y ago
The asymmetrical warfare of bullshit "science" is demoralizing. It seems to take so much effort to get the bad stuff taken down, compared with the apparent ease of made-up stuff to be published. This one is pretty crazy: a paper alleging paranormal time-reversed causality still not retracted 10 years later https://replicationindex.com/2018/01/05/bem-retraction/ https://replicationindex.com/2018/01/05/bem-retraction/
- ALittleLight 5y agoThis article makes a great case for why parapsychology is worthwhile. A researcher follows common practices and comes up with an absurd result. In figuring out how that happened researchers discover problems with the entire field. That's utility for parapsychology I've never imagined.
- Tenoke 5y agoScott Alexander makes that case in one of my favourite posts - "The control group is out of control". The control group for science being parapsychology. https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/04/28/the-control-group-is-out-of-control/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/04/28/the-control-group-is-o...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- HPsquared 5y ago"It could be that the purpose of your study is only to serve a a warning to others."
- naasking 5y ago> It seems to take so much effort to get the bad stuff taken down, compared with the apparent ease of made-up stuff to be published. More than that, flawed studies with false results get cited more often, which is a main incentive for scientific prominence.