2 ms·

> So no. 99% consensus in science isn't that uncommon and no it's generally not a bad thing. To put things in perspective, there is a 97% consensus on evolutio

> So no. 99% consensus in science isn't that uncommon and no it's generally not a bad thing. To put things in perspective, there is a 97% consensus on evolution theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution#:~:text=Nearly%20all%20(around%2097%25),proposed%20by%20intelligent%20design%20proponents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution.... That basically means we are more certain about the cause of climate change than about evolution.

Proven 5y ago
No, that doesn't put things in perspective at all. To put things in perspective, a 97% consensus on evolution theory doesn't impact me any way. I can choose whatever I prefer or even refuse to take a position. The globalist-climatist agenda steals from me via taxation and restricts my freedom, regardless of what I think. And as I noted in another comment, the consensus is totally irrelevant to begin with because the question isn't whether there are changes or who or what causes them. The manufactured consensus that matters is that undoing the supposed changes is possible and can be forced in a way that doesn't leave me poorer - both of those assumumptions are unproven and very likely false. Put that in your perspective.