5 ms·

These are results that have been arrived at by using the scientific method, not opinions. If you disagree, visit the sources and review their methods and conclu

These are results that have been arrived at by using the scientific method, not opinions. If you disagree, visit the sources and review their methods and conclusions.

malloryerik 5y ago
Exactly. If you can build a fact-based, defensible case that anthropogenic global warming is a mistaken idea, you will be showered with nearly limitless cash to continue your investigation.
- eganist 5y ago
  > Exactly. If you can build a fact-based, defensible case that anthropogenic global warming is mistaken then you will be showered with nearly limitless cash to continue your investigation. Heck, even sham climate anti-science gets nearly limitless cash in order to extend the runways of industries that would be regulated out of existence until greener industries take over. Actual, reproducible science that demonstrates a flaw in current thinking serious enough to debunk the idea that humans are the genesis of climate change would get much more.
- philliphaydon 5y ago
  Literally questioning a climate study gets you castrated. When someone says “when you factor in this and this into the models it doesn’t match up with the conclusion” and suggest that data is cherry picked. Boom end of career. If I was a scientist I would be way too scared to go against the norm because it’s career ending. Climate science has no “real” science anymore.
  - malloryerik 5y ago
    Could you give some examples of careers being ended like this?
    - silverpepsi 5y ago
      I found this a super interesting read https://jennifermarohasy.com/2021/10/plain-english-lost-on-the-high-court-of-australia/ https://jennifermarohasy.com/2021/10/plain-english-lost-on-t... It isn't exactly what you're asking for but shows a clear picture of the climate of fear which prevents certain things even being put out there. It reminds me of the group that didn't believe HIV causing AIDS had ever been given sufficient scientific proof to be a fact and how they were treated. (Including Kary Mullis, the inventor behind your PCR covid test!)
  - eganist 5y ago
    > Literally questioning a climate study gets you castrated. When someone says “when you factor in this and this into the models it doesn’t match up with the conclusion” and suggest that data is cherry picked. Boom end of career. If I was a scientist I would be way too scared to go against the norm because it’s career ending. Climate science has no “real” science anymore. Do you have any peer-reviewed papers I can read which break climate models with missing factors? I'm keen on reading and understanding them (as well as the outcomes for the authors)

These are results that have been arrived at by using the scientific method, not opinions. If you disagree, visit the sources and review their methods and conclusions.

malloryerik 5y ago

Exactly. If you can build a fact-based, defensible case that anthropogenic global warming is a mistaken idea, you will be showered with nearly limitless cash to continue your investigation.

eganist 5y ago
> Exactly. If you can build a fact-based, defensible case that anthropogenic global warming is mistaken then you will be showered with nearly limitless cash to continue your investigation. Heck, even sham climate anti-science gets nearly limitless cash in order to extend the runways of industries that would be regulated out of existence until greener industries take over. Actual, reproducible science that demonstrates a flaw in current thinking serious enough to debunk the idea that humans are the genesis of climate change would get much more.
philliphaydon 5y ago
Literally questioning a climate study gets you castrated. When someone says “when you factor in this and this into the models it doesn’t match up with the conclusion” and suggest that data is cherry picked. Boom end of career. If I was a scientist I would be way too scared to go against the norm because it’s career ending. Climate science has no “real” science anymore.
- malloryerik 5y ago
  Could you give some examples of careers being ended like this?
  - silverpepsi 5y ago
    I found this a super interesting read https://jennifermarohasy.com/2021/10/plain-english-lost-on-the-high-court-of-australia/ https://jennifermarohasy.com/2021/10/plain-english-lost-on-t... It isn't exactly what you're asking for but shows a clear picture of the climate of fear which prevents certain things even being put out there. It reminds me of the group that didn't believe HIV causing AIDS had ever been given sufficient scientific proof to be a fact and how they were treated. (Including Kary Mullis, the inventor behind your PCR covid test!)
- eganist 5y ago
  > Literally questioning a climate study gets you castrated. When someone says “when you factor in this and this into the models it doesn’t match up with the conclusion” and suggest that data is cherry picked. Boom end of career. If I was a scientist I would be way too scared to go against the norm because it’s career ending. Climate science has no “real” science anymore. Do you have any peer-reviewed papers I can read which break climate models with missing factors? I'm keen on reading and understanding them (as well as the outcomes for the authors)