5 ms·
This isn't race grievances though. It's marketing grievances... on a product that we're discussing. I understand. I've seen several cases where you've moderate
by seoulmetro 5y ago
This isn't race grievances though. It's marketing grievances... on a product that we're discussing.
I understand. I've seen several cases where you've moderated unfairly in order to maintain some form of status quo, where the quo is just an opinion that we all have to share.
Familiarised myself with the rules long ago, but it doesn't really matter since anything that someone might get upset at is suddenly hovered within there.
- dang 5y agoOf course it was race grievance. That was obvious and unmistakeable—as it also is in comments like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28925162 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28925162 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28925097 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28925097, btw. Your statements about moderation are inaccurate in ways I think I just addressed.
- seoulmetro 5y agoYes. None of those break the rules. I guess you can address whatever you want because at the end of the day (post), it's clear that you're not actually going to moderate appropriately and are just trying to generate an echo chamber. That's cool though. It's your website, not ours. You're free to censor whatever you want. My statements are accurate though. You won't be able to censor that out. Edit: Since you seem to miss a lot of actual inappropriate material, I've flagged it for you. Hope you can learn from my experience.
- dang 5y agoThose comments obviously break the rules—they're pure flamebait. Please don't post like that to HN any more.
- seoulmetro 5y agoNo. They do not and are not. But I'm not the decider of what gets falsely labelled as what.