3 ms·
Hiding error messages is one thing. What about showcasing devices that pretended to work but then shipping the tests to be run in normal labs?
by outworlder 5y ago
Hiding error messages is one thing.
What about showcasing devices that pretended to work but then shipping the tests to be run in normal labs?
- dfsegoat 5y ago> What about showcasing devices that pretended to work but then shipping the tests to be run in normal labs? They didn't even have any basic systems validation / quality management documentation, which is how they racked up their first FDA inspection violations. This really should have been obvious to anyone doing due diligence in a regulated space (devices, pharma, etc.).
- Breza 5y agoAfter reading Bad Blood, I can't help but wonder if CVS spotted the scam and stayed away.
- wolverine876 5y agoWhile the behavior is atrocious IMHO, the article doesn't say the tests were run in 'normal labs': > the actual test would be run in a lab away from prying eyes That lab could have been using a Theranos machine, but with errors displayed, etc.