3 ms·
Except we're talking about over 20 pictures. Do you know how often you'll get heads 20 times in a row? I'll give you a hint, it's in the neighborhood of 1 in 2
by dexterdog 5y ago
Except we're talking about over 20 pictures. Do you know how often you'll get heads 20 times in a row? I'll give you a hint, it's in the neighborhood of 1 in 2 million.
- smt88 5y agoAs others have said, the large group of pictures of non-white people is about a specific feature: a camera that does a better job of capturing darker skin tones. So we can ignore those. The other pictures I see are: - White woman - Asian man - White(?) man (the guy with a man-bun who's jumping) - White(?) man looking at mountains (his hand looks beige, so he could be any lighter-skinned race) - Black woman - Black man/woman - White man/woman - Asian family - Asian man/woman and Black woman - children that are too small to see - Asian woman - Asian woman That's 20 people, 15 of whom seem to have an identifiable race. Of those 15, 3 are White, which is 20%. The US is ~60% White and humanity is ~15% White. So what exactly are you complaining about? In the grand universe of marketing pictures, White people have been dramatically overrepresented. Did you complain about that in the past? I think they will survive being slightly underrepresented this time.