I'd have a lot more sympathy for this argument if the Theranos machines were actually capable of doing the tests that they were pretending to run. I think ther

I'd have a lot more sympathy for this argument if the Theranos machines were actually capable of doing the tests that they were pretending to run. I think there's a world of difference between a) simulating a technology that a company really can provide just to ensure that things run smoothly for the test and b) pretending to offer a technology that, in fact, the company couldn't provide at all.