3 ms·
Not sure. China, India, Africa etc were colonized for much shorter periods of time. One point of comparison would be Ireland. They didn't suffer from colonist-
by pasabagi 5y ago
Not sure. China, India, Africa etc were colonized for much shorter periods of time.
One point of comparison would be Ireland. They didn't suffer from colonist-brought diseases, because obviously they had all the same diseases already, but they did suffer a precipitous decline in population.
Another example would be the west coast of Africa, which was similarly colonized from early modernity on.
- paganel 5y ago> but they did suffer a precipitous decline in population. That was a TIL for me, because I was about to say tat the "precipitous decline in population" only happened in the mid-19th century, i.e. a couple of centuries after Cromwell's campaign (the point where the English power over Ireland really became a colonial one), but then I skimmed through the History section of the Ireland wikipedia page [1] and I read this: > This control was consolidated during the wars and conflicts of the 17th century, including the English and Scottish colonisation in the Plantations of Ireland, the Wars of the Three Kingdoms and the Williamite War. and > Physician-general William Petty estimated that 504,000 Catholic Irish and 112,000 Protestant settlers died, and 100,000 people were transported, as a result of the war.[66] If a prewar population of 1.5 million is assumed, this would mean that the population was reduced by almost half. Again, I personally had no idea that Ireland's population was reduced by almost half immediately after the English conquest that happened during Cromwell's time, that's kind of gruesome and imo not studied enough outside of Ireland and the UK (I suppose that this subject is studied in there). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland#The_Kingdom_of_Ireland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland#The_Kingdom_of_Ireland