3 ms·
You're arguing that tests for intellectual ability aren't perfect, and they're therefore useless. This is a bad argument.
by fighterpilot 5y ago
You're arguing that tests for intellectual ability aren't perfect, and they're therefore useless. This is a bad argument.
- politician 5y agoIt's the same argument as for eliminating TAG programs: that no one should be accelerated because not everyone is accelerated. This seems like a distressingly common construction. Is it a logical fallacy? Does it have a name?
- EEBio 5y agoFalse dillema or false dichotomy.[0] These arguments are built on the apparent either-or black-and-white setup, while in the reality, a range of possibilities exists. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
- cutemonster 5y ago> Does it have a name? The word "jealousy" comes to my mind Maybe sometimes feelings, not logic underlies the arguments? And any logics was made up afterwards