4 ms·
The OP wants to avoid censorship. They did not mention wanting anonymity. For example I used to shoot a lot of artistic nude photography. I published the work
by jdavis703 5y ago
The OP wants to avoid censorship. They did not mention wanting anonymity.
For example I used to shoot a lot of artistic nude photography. I published the work under my own name.
I had no desire to hide my name, and thus my primary concern were using platforms that allowed my content.
Now of course some people will want to publish their work anonymously. But free speech does not require anonymity.
- gambiting 5y agoYes, but if you get banned for uploading copyrighted content on PH once then you're banned for life as opening another account and verifying it would be very hard.
- jdavis703 5y agoPerhaps we differ on the meaning of free speech, but I do not believe copyright itself is a violation of the spirit off free speech. In a sense copyright can be seen as enabling more free speech, since it enables people the opportunity to support themselves through artistic & intellectual pursuits that would otherwise be unprofitable without copyright protections.
- gambiting 5y agoWell, copyright is just an example of things they could still ban you for. My point is that any ban for any reason on PH is much worse in consequence than a ban on YT, because the strong user verification means you won't be able to upload ever again. Posting political videos from any side would get you banned too, and I'm sure that fits your definition of free speech