3 ms·

Looks cool but if possible remove the dependence on ARC.

vtail 15y ago
Unless you need to support iOS 3.x, you'll get ARC for free for your iOS 5.x _and_ iOS 4.x projects in September with Xcode 4.2 (currently in beta). ARC and non-ARC libraries can also co-exists in the same project. So it seems quite logical for developers to rely on most modern technologies, esp. since supporting older technologies comes with a cost.
- marcomonteiro 15y ago
  Understood, but technically we're not supposed to submit to the App Store using beta versions of Xcode. Whether Apple would notice is a different story but a rejection would set us back so I'm not willing to risk it.
  - Zev 15y ago
    This isn't a technicality. Apple will reject your app if you compile with Xcode 4.2.
    - escoz 15y ago
      Not for long though, 4.2 is just around the corner. I can't see them doing too many extra betas before releasing it. By the time you develop your app with this library 4.2 is probably going to be released anyway.
      - Zev 15y ago
        We're assuming 4.2 is going to be released soon. No one actually knows. It might be tomorrow, it might be October.
        escoz 15y ago
        You're right.. but from previous experience, apple doesn't usually do a lot more than 5 or so beta builds. Still, its not like I'm doing more work anyway, going with ARC saved time on development. If Apple ends up never releasing 4.2, I would just had to "finish" the job.
- to3m 15y ago
  What about if you just don't want to use Xcode 4.x, because it's (still) missing Xcode 3.2 feature(s) that you use on a daily basis? :) Looks like a cool library though! Once they manage to make Xcode 4.x work as well as Xcode 3.2, I will try it.
  - escoz 15y ago
    Personally, I thing XCode sucks, either 3x or 4x. It's a really bad environment, I can't see how people use it or like it. Have you tried AppCode, from JetBrains? Its still in beta, but its magnificent.
escoz 15y ago
Thanks Marco. For now, I'm not really looking into doing manual memory management, as I don't have any need for it, but you're more than welcome to fork out the code and add it if you would like.
- marcomonteiro 15y ago
  I did fork it and will be taking a look at it. Thanks for open-sourcing this. It really does look like it can be extremely useful.

vtail 15y ago

Unless you need to support iOS 3.x, you'll get ARC for free for your iOS 5.x _and_ iOS 4.x projects in September with Xcode 4.2 (currently in beta). ARC and non-ARC libraries can also co-exists in the same project. So it seems quite logical for developers to rely on most modern technologies, esp. since supporting older technologies comes with a cost.

marcomonteiro 15y ago
Understood, but technically we're not supposed to submit to the App Store using beta versions of Xcode. Whether Apple would notice is a different story but a rejection would set us back so I'm not willing to risk it.
- Zev 15y ago
  This isn't a technicality. Apple will reject your app if you compile with Xcode 4.2.
  - escoz 15y ago
    Not for long though, 4.2 is just around the corner. I can't see them doing too many extra betas before releasing it. By the time you develop your app with this library 4.2 is probably going to be released anyway.
    - Zev 15y ago
      We're assuming 4.2 is going to be released soon. No one actually knows. It might be tomorrow, it might be October.
      - escoz 15y ago
        You're right.. but from previous experience, apple doesn't usually do a lot more than 5 or so beta builds. Still, its not like I'm doing more work anyway, going with ARC saved time on development. If Apple ends up never releasing 4.2, I would just had to "finish" the job.
to3m 15y ago
What about if you just don't want to use Xcode 4.x, because it's (still) missing Xcode 3.2 feature(s) that you use on a daily basis? :) Looks like a cool library though! Once they manage to make Xcode 4.x work as well as Xcode 3.2, I will try it.
- escoz 15y ago
  Personally, I thing XCode sucks, either 3x or 4x. It's a really bad environment, I can't see how people use it or like it. Have you tried AppCode, from JetBrains? Its still in beta, but its magnificent.

escoz 15y ago

Thanks Marco. For now, I'm not really looking into doing manual memory management, as I don't have any need for it, but you're more than welcome to fork out the code and add it if you would like.

marcomonteiro 15y ago
I did fork it and will be taking a look at it. Thanks for open-sourcing this. It really does look like it can be extremely useful.