What I think gets lost in this debate is whether or no 'gifted and talented' is even an accurate abstraction. Even if you think that some students are smarter

What I think gets lost in this debate is whether or no 'gifted and talented' is even an accurate abstraction. Even if you think that some students are smarter or more capable than others, it seems like the ultimate goal should be adaptable education, no matter if you're faster or slower than other students. 'gifted' kids with extreme ADHD may be no more able to cope in a generic 'gifted and talented program' than someone without inborn talents.