> If the tax was substantial I'd support this. Start at 10% with a commitment to ratchet it up by 4% per year or something. That's enough to start an immediat

> If the tax was substantial I'd support this. Start at 10% with a commitment to ratchet it up by 4% per year or something. That's enough to start an immediate reduction without destroying the industry. If you're making choices about engine overhaul now for an overhaul that will last you 7-8 years of light use, fuel costing 40% more at the end of that overhaul will definitely get your attention. > it's already been graduated. Doing nothing for decades when it was impossible; and then doing nothing for a decade or two when transition became possible; and then pushing the industry off the cliff is not graduated.