4 ms·
I really fail to understand why Michael allowed this behaviour. If it got to a point where voice has been raised, there should have been a concern started and s
by noway421 5y ago
I really fail to understand why Michael allowed this behaviour. If it got to a point where voice has been raised, there should have been a concern started and security called into place, promptly adjourning the meeting. Who knows where else this would have gone after that?
I wouldn't want to know the fury of a disgruntled Founder looking to revenge for a failed YC interview.
Sometimes it is about professionalism. Even though the founder is feeling passionate about their problem space, there are some boundaries you never cross.
- gridspy 5y agoShouting isn't actually dangerous. It's only dangerous when it is combined with violence or a threat of violence. In this case it's more of an emotional outburst due to frustration. If you suppress all emotion with an escalation to a threat of police and security you're going to have a far less dynamic and safe workplace.