3 ms·
You're not going to find scientfic positions advertised on LinkedIn, and I don't know what other blind spots that selection makes. I would concede if you compar
by rhn_mk1 5y ago
You're not going to find scientfic positions advertised on LinkedIn, and I don't know what other blind spots that selection makes. I would concede if you compared StackOverflow questions. That would also reflect the definition of "alive" from the article better ("actual usage").
- robomartin 5y agoOh, please! https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apl https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apl 266 questions https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/fortran https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/fortran 11,855 questions https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/forth https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/forth 262 questions https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/python https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/python 1,817,529 questions https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/c++ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/c++ 741,496 questions LISP: 6,615 javascript: 2,285,941 java: 1,805,413 c#: 1,503,129 php: 1,417,981 etc. If "underwater_basket_weaving" was a tag it would likely get more questions than APL, Forth and LISP combined. Let it go...