4 ms·
Defines fantastic because a 1080ti from 4 years ago run faster than the M1. My 2070 could run wow at 144fps, and it's a 2.5y/o card. Yet most people can't get
by Thaxll 5y ago
Defines fantastic because a 1080ti from 4 years ago run faster than the M1. My 2070 could run wow at 144fps, and it's a 2.5y/o card.
Yet most people can't get 60fps: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhcJzKCcpMQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhcJzKCcpMQ
Edit: thanks for the dates update
- microtonal 5y agoThe 1080 Ti was made available in March 2017, so it's 4.5 years old. Not 6.
- windowsrookie 5y agoComparing the M1 to a 1080ti is ridiculous. The 1080ti draws 250+ watts. The M1 draws 10w in the MacBook Air. In the current market you can buy a MacBook Air (an entire laptop computer) for less than buying just a midrange GPU.
- Thaxll 5y agoWell Apple compared themself to a 3080m which is faster than a 1080ti.
- Zarel 5y agoNo one has explained what you got wrong, so in case anyone reading this is still confused, Apple compared an M1 Max to a 3080m. An M1 Max's graphics card is ~4x as fast as an M1.
- hraedon 5y agoApple compared the M1 Max to a 3080m. 4x the GPU cores and up to 8x the memory makes a difference, and it wouldn't be at all surprising to see that their numbers are accurate.
- clarkmoreno 5y agolol, got ‘em