> Another was a version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf, rewritten in feminist jargon So rewritten it's difficult to identify how it's connected to Mein Kampf. https:/

> Another was a version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf, rewritten in feminist jargon So rewritten it's difficult to identify how it's connected to Mein Kampf. https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2018/10/09/nothing-squared-is-still-nothing/ https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2018/10/09/nothing-s... - "I read through their article Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism and then went through the chapter of Mein Kampf this article is supposed to be mimicking ... and couldn’t find a single phrase that matched." Or from https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2018/10/why-the-grievance-studies-hoax-was-not-unethical-but-its-not-very-interesting-either/ https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2018/10/why-the-grieva... - "However, the account of this given by the hoaxers is rather dishonest. Their re-writing of the text was so extensive that even a side-by-side comparison of the texts failed to show much similarity between them. Moreover, the part of Mein Kampf in question was making rather general claims about how to respond to (perceived) oppression. But to read the hoaxers’ account of things you’d think a Nazi diatribe had been published by a feminist journal with just a few words changed. And that’s not the case at all." > What do 400-odd cases matter, after all? It would be nice to put that in context, rather than make a rhetorical flourish. That context should include the politics around UNC's decision to deny Hannah-Jones tenure.