4 ms·
It's very interesting that you're in a way encouraging that the veil that is there concealing the process of food manufacturing ... remain there. Because that i
by jimmyjim 15y ago
It's very interesting that you're in a way encouraging that the veil that is there concealing the process of food manufacturing ... remain there. Because that is something that sensible environmentalists argue against, as everyone could stand to know a bit more about what they're eating, and the issues of food safety and food security associated with the food taht they're eating. I think Food Inc does a good of bringing these issues to the public in a very presentable way.
- jonnathanson 15y ago"It's very interesting that you're in a way encouraging that the veil that is there concealing the process of food manufacturing ... remain there." Not at all. I'm just drawing a point of comparison between the "PR" of the sausage vs. the PR of treated wastewater. I don't condone opacity or trickery on behalf of the food processing industry. Just the opposite, in fact. On the subject of Food, Inc: Michael Pollan's Omnivore's Dilemma is an excellent read on the topic, and I recommend it highly. It has been highly influential on my personal philosophy toward food and the industrial food system.