4 ms·
I take offense at that. Yes, you might be achieving the holy grail of storing carbon, but a collection of identical, equidistant trees with barely any other for
by agent327 5y ago
I take offense at that. Yes, you might be achieving the holy grail of storing carbon, but a collection of identical, equidistant trees with barely any other form of life between them is not a forest, it's a soul-crushing horror show.
- uuidgen 5y agoCompare that to a strip mine and it is way smaller horror. It can create place to live for animals, it can reduce particulates in the air. It's not a normal long-living forest that is grown for wood for 80-100+ years but it's still way better than burning coal.
- KptMarchewa 5y agoIt's not a forest. It's a field, the same as wheat or corn, just that the product is different.