4 ms·

One still needs oh-my-fish, as one needs oh-my-zsh. So the setup time is 100% equal for fish and zsh. https://github.com/oh-my-fish/oh-my-fish https://github.c

• nerdponx 5y ago
  I very strongly disagree that you need or even want OMZ. You don't need it for Bash, why would you need it for Zsh? It might be nice when you're getting started, so you don't have to learn all the ins and outs of the shell to have cool prompts and other useful functionality.
• faho 5y ago
  Despite the similar names, what oh-my-fish and oh-my-zsh provide isn't comparable. E.g. oh-my-zsh adds a bunch of keybindings and a git prompt, and sets a bunch of options (like turning on history deduplication, or comments in interactive sessions). Fish already does equivalents of much of that, by default, so oh-my-fish doesn't have to do it. They mostly add more prompts (with their own, separate, git prompt implementation) and provide a package manager. That means fish without oh-my-fish is already close to the experience of zsh with oh-my-zsh. (disclaimer: I'm a fish developer, and not really involved with oh-my-fish - I sent a few courtesy patches over the years)
• Hamuko 5y ago
  ~ > omf fish: Unknown command: omf Apparently one does not.