4 ms·

I made a police report in Thailand many years ago at the local police office. The lady at the desk insisted that, rather than writing my home address down, I p

I made a police report in Thailand many years ago at the local police office. The lady at the desk insisted that, rather than writing my home address down, I pronounced it so that she could transcribe it into Thai script. I always wondered what they would use my home address in Thai letters for. I am sure the Swedish postal service would have a hard time if they ever decided to write me a follow up letter. I also wonder what it would look like if they realized that it should need to be in Latin alphabet and they had to translate back it before sending.

mzi 5y ago
The Swedish Post Office had at least before a department for unreadable addresses, that would put great pride in finding the correct recipient. I have sent letter addressed to "the red house with blue door, if you take the first road right from the ferry stop to this island in the Stockholm Archipelago", and received a letter with the address as a rebus. It might have change now, but many years ago I guess the letter addressed to you in phonetic Thai would have got delivered!
- jfk13 5y ago
  Some years ago while living & working in South Asia, I tried this with a letter to my family back in England, writing the address in Devanagari script. (Another time, also tried it with Urdu.) The UK post office managed to decipher and deliver them just fine.
- fifilura 5y ago
  That was probably many years ago. One of the doubtful benefits of tax-financed government monopolies.
  - fifilura 5y ago
    This comment got a -1 rating. To clarify I am not a die-hard neo-liberal (in the original meaning). I am Swedish after all. Just that the team that had the hobby to be mail-detectives, could instead have been employed by the government as nurses or caregivers. Or even improved the package delivery services in the postal service (very much needed).
    - mzi 5y ago
      The reason for these departments is to maintain the secrecy of correspondence ("brevhemlighet"). This department is the only one within the postal service that has the right to open mail and try to decode who is the recipient. The rebuse or other shenanigans is not the majority of letters, but unreadable handwriting, wet or in other ways damaged so the recipient cannot reliably be established.
      - fifilura 5y ago
        Opening mail to preserve secrecy of correspondence sounds rather counter-intuitive. Why not just shred them?
- dotancohen 5y ago
  I once received a letter addressed to: Dotan, Sarid, Israel That letter crossed the Atlantic ocean, the European continent, and found my one-room lodging slightly over 10,000 KM away. I like to think that this is some kind of record character count vs distance in modern times. Though this might be the most impressive feat of decyphering a letter, translating handwritten kio-8r displayed as latin-1: http://mottr.am/2012/09/18/letter-to-russia/ http://mottr.am/2012/09/18/letter-to-russia/

mzi 5y ago

The Swedish Post Office had at least before a department for unreadable addresses, that would put great pride in finding the correct recipient. I have sent letter addressed to "the red house with blue door, if you take the first road right from the ferry stop to this island in the Stockholm Archipelago", and received a letter with the address as a rebus. It might have change now, but many years ago I guess the letter addressed to you in phonetic Thai would have got delivered!

jfk13 5y ago
Some years ago while living & working in South Asia, I tried this with a letter to my family back in England, writing the address in Devanagari script. (Another time, also tried it with Urdu.) The UK post office managed to decipher and deliver them just fine.
fifilura 5y ago
That was probably many years ago. One of the doubtful benefits of tax-financed government monopolies.
- fifilura 5y ago
  This comment got a -1 rating. To clarify I am not a die-hard neo-liberal (in the original meaning). I am Swedish after all. Just that the team that had the hobby to be mail-detectives, could instead have been employed by the government as nurses or caregivers. Or even improved the package delivery services in the postal service (very much needed).
  - mzi 5y ago
    The reason for these departments is to maintain the secrecy of correspondence ("brevhemlighet"). This department is the only one within the postal service that has the right to open mail and try to decode who is the recipient. The rebuse or other shenanigans is not the majority of letters, but unreadable handwriting, wet or in other ways damaged so the recipient cannot reliably be established.
    - fifilura 5y ago
      Opening mail to preserve secrecy of correspondence sounds rather counter-intuitive. Why not just shred them?
dotancohen 5y ago
I once received a letter addressed to: Dotan, Sarid, Israel That letter crossed the Atlantic ocean, the European continent, and found my one-room lodging slightly over 10,000 KM away. I like to think that this is some kind of record character count vs distance in modern times. Though this might be the most impressive feat of decyphering a letter, translating handwritten kio-8r displayed as latin-1: http://mottr.am/2012/09/18/letter-to-russia/ http://mottr.am/2012/09/18/letter-to-russia/