4 ms·
>security hole Its really not that hard to imagine how you can do this in a secure way. Git has identity and signatures built in. Maybe only updates from tru
by jayd16 5y ago
>security hole
Its really not that hard to imagine how you can do this in a secure way. Git has identity and signatures built in. Maybe only updates from trusted users are considered, and you still must agree to the updates, etc etc.
Throwing up our hands and saying its impossible seems like a terrible choice.
- morelisp 5y agoIf you're going to make me manually agree to the updates, you may as well just have me run a script manually. I'm not saying it's impossible! I'm saying it's pointless. Trust people set up their own config given tools and instructions, and they might even surprise you by coming up with a better workflow.
- jayd16 5y agoThird party tooling could interface with something built in but not the one off scripts people use now. I'm not trying to be draconian here. I just want a built in way to share needed configuration information that we have to special case now.