3 ms·
That sounds really painful to work with, and it would still largely lack backwards compatibility -- hosts on both ends would need to be patched to support the "
by duskwuff 5y ago
That sounds really painful to work with, and it would still largely lack backwards compatibility -- hosts on both ends would need to be patched to support the "double address".
- seiferteric 5y agopatching hosts would be easy, but the routers in between would probably not need any changes and that's big since it was one of the holdups of v6 deployment.