I think this really just boils down to him posting copyrighted content, and the de-blurring is incidental, right? It would be very interesting if anything hing

I think this really just boils down to him posting copyrighted content, and the de-blurring is incidental, right? It would be very interesting if anything hinged on the de-blurring. The GAN model is essentially imagining what the pictures look like behind the blurring, it's not somehow cheating the information loss, so from a technical perspective, it's really just making a good guess at what someone's parts (or whatever was blurred) look like. It would be interesting to understand how that would be handled legally, though like I say, I don't think the de-blurring is material here.