3 ms·
>In Vitro is a good sign that it may also be effective in vivo My understanding is that the In Vitro study required massive dosages of Ivermectin to achieve th
by jasonlaramburu 5y ago
>In Vitro is a good sign that it may also be effective in vivo
My understanding is that the In Vitro study required massive dosages of Ivermectin to achieve the reported tissue concentration and antiviral effect. That's why clinical trails are so important to see if the effect is observed at a safe dosage.
>people don't trust corporations to look out for their best interests especially drug companies
I completely get that, but it seems equally dangerous to trust random people on the internet writing about ivermectin.
- nickthemagicman 5y ago>> I completely get that, but it seems equally dangerous to trust random people on the internet writing about ivermectin. Does it?
- jasonlaramburu 5y agoYes, at least the companies that run clinical trials are not the same companies making the drugs. They won’t get paid more if a drug is successful. Random influencers on the internet have a direct financial interest in getting people to do what they say.
- nickthemagicman 5y agoHaha if thats what feel good to you then sure! Why the heck not! Whatever ideas feel groovy to you man!