5 ms·
Not sure you're being fair here. There's roughly 2 dozen photos of people on the page, 2 of which appear to be white-ish men. One whole section of six photos
by whalabi 5y ago
Not sure you're being fair here.
There's roughly 2 dozen photos of people on the page, 2 of which appear to be white-ish men.
One whole section of six photos is explicitly there to demonstrate that their cameras now work as well for people who aren't white. Itself an issue of underrepresentation.
Several others appear to be white-ish women.
You say "I'm not sure why it's ok to vastly prefer one group for representation" but there's many groups represented, black, white, Asian, and men and women of each. The fact you see "non-whites" as one "group" is a little odd. It doesn't seem good to me.
And of course the main point is that if you total the representation in society, white males are still massively, incredibly overrepresented, so I don't think it was really necessary to make this post.
- seoulmetro 5y agoThere are no fair skinned men on the page. Weird for something marketed mostly towards fair skinned people. Not so weird once you realise it has an agenda behind it. The truth is, they're forcing an extremist view on diversity in spite of the facts. They're allowed to do that. We're allowed to point out the hypocrisy.
- whalabi 5y agoWhat's the agenda?
- seoulmetro 5y ago>they're forcing an extremist view on diversity I don't know why they're doing it. But there is an agenda and this is how they do it.
- eclipxe 5y agoWhat's the agenda?
- seoulmetro 5y ago>they're forcing an extremist view on diversity I don't know why they're doing it. But there is an agenda and this is how they do it. Try reading.