3 ms·
This is a super creative argument :D Arguing for protectionism for yourself while complaining about the cost of protectionism for the unemployed!! Who would b
by random314 5y ago
This is a super creative argument :D
Arguing for protectionism for yourself while complaining about the cost of protectionism for the unemployed!!
Who would be the "welfare queen" in this case. Is it those people who would have been unemployed with/without immigrants? OR Is it those who would have been employed only because of the presence of immigrants?
As brexiteers have shown, be careful what you wish for.
- kfprt 5y ago"Promote the general welfare" is written in the constitution. It is my understanding that this is the point of government. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/preamble https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/preamble