5 ms·
Thought you started out sarcastic, then realized you might not be sarcastic. Amazing that people went from "we need all colors represented in ads as best as po
by randomopining 5y ago
Thought you started out sarcastic, then realized you might not be sarcastic.
Amazing that people went from "we need all colors represented in ads as best as possible" which was completely reasonable, to "maybe we don't need white people in ads at all sometimes, ok? maybe it's a good thing!" which is objectively an absurd stance.
- jbluepolarbear 5y agoWhat’s so absurd? Often people of color are left out, why not the reverse? Your view stinks of privilege.
- randomopining 5y agoSo when an ad has only whites, you would say: "why is this not representative of the people of this country!?" Then in this case I say: "why is this not representative of the people of this country!?" Your response, a smarmy "why not?" and personal attack. The failure can speak for itself.
- jbluepolarbear 5y agoYour racism is stinky
- randomopining 5y agoSuch a sophomoric response to call a nuanced opinion like mine "racist".
- ir123 5y agoI'm genuinely asking, are you insecure that white people might be left out for good or something? I don't get how some occasional over representation of minorities bothers people this much. It wouldn't bother me a bit if it happened in my country.
- randomopining 5y agoI'm not insecure about any of that. I'm just agreeing with the guy who sees this blatant hypocrisy and calls it out. It bothers a bit because it such an obvious thing, where they had to go through and find the exact people they wanted and you know that they purposely did it because it's "the thing" right now.