I'm finding it oddly sloppy as well. > consistently longer than the shortest-distance path computed using the standard Dijkstra algorithm The algorithm used t

I'm finding it oddly sloppy as well. > consistently longer than the shortest-distance path computed using the standard Dijkstra algorithm The algorithm used to compute shortest-distance is entirely irrelevant, unless there's some doubt about the correctness of the algorithm! > In this Article, Does Nature CS mandate that article is capitalized? It looks very odd.